(Q1) What does a culture of sustainability mean for citizens of the building, and what can influence its development? | |
Q1 Themes (Q1-T1) Individual interest and commitment to sustainability (Q1-T2) Community-building for collective action on sustainability with shared purposes (Q1-T3) An empowering, healthy and enabling environmental context | |
(Q2) What, if any, building features positively or negatively influence the sustainable values and practices of citizens and their organizations? | |
Q2 Themes (Q2-T1) Many evolv1 features already promote sustainable values, norms and practices (Q2-T2) Sustainability is not always ‘pure’ (Q2-T3) Some evolv1 features are actively discouraging more sustainable values, norms and practices (Q2-T4) evolv1 still embodies several ‘missed opportunities’ | |
(Q3) How does the building symbolically communicate to people and how do symbols in the building environment translate into citizens’ own sustainability-related values and practices? | |
Q3 Themes (Q3-T1) Certain building features clearly function as symbolic ‘green features’ (Q3-T2) Symbolic communication often requires ‘standing out’ (Q3-T3) What is missing or invisible in an environment can unintentionally create a ‘negative symbol’ for sustainability (Q3-T4) Sustainability communication and education are distinct from but connected to sustainability symbolism (Q3-T5) Concern over symbolic representation of sustainability, versus actual sustainability | |
(Q4) What could be done to further promote sustainable values and practices at evolv1? | |
Q4 Themes (Q4-T1) Reconsider the function of spaces within and around evolv1 to center sustainability and community-building (Q4-T2) Combine existing symbolic communication with direct sustainability education and engagement (Q4-T3) Encourage more sustainable behaviours and discourage less sustainable behaviours (Q4-T4) Increase opportunities for social connection, nature connection, community-building and sustainability leadership |